Meditation: by Judy Chicago
And then all that has divided us will merge.
And then compassion will be wedded to power.
And then softness will come to a world that is often harsh and unkind.
And then both women and men will be gentle.
And then both men and women will be strong.
And then no other person will be subject to another's will.
And then all will be rich and varied.
And then all will share equally in the earth's abundance.
And then all will care for the sick and the weak and the old.
And then all will nourish the young.
And then all will cherish life's creatures.
And then all will live in harmony with each other and the earth.
And then everywhere will be called Eden once again.
Reading: by Unitarian Universalist minister Bruce Marshall, from his book A Holy Curiosity (p. 110)
“You know,” a new member of the congregation I serve said to me, “this is not the real world.”
“Oh?” I said, without understanding. This person when on to explain.
It’s not the real world because in the real world Christians and Jews and theists and humanists don’t even try to live together. And in the real world you don’t seek to understand another person’s ideas - you attack or ridicule or ignore them. In the real world gay people and lesbians and straight people don’t share in the same life together. And in the real world people are kicked around a lot and nobody cares very much, and you can pray to your God to hurt somebody else, and that’s acceptable.
And so you shouldn’t think that this congregation is the real world, because it isn’t.
Reading: a Congregational Covenant Statement crafted by the members of this church, and approved on October 2nd, 2005
We, the members of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Urbana-Champaign, strive to sustain a caring community that promotes the personal and spiritual well-being of our members and of the larger world in which we live. To this end,
We promise to participate actively in the life of our church, to contribute as we are able, and to express appreciation for others’ contributions.
We promise to join in shaping congregational life through processes that are open, inclusive, and transparent, and to support the decisions made by our chosen leaders and the congregation as a whole.
We promise to celebrate the diversity of our collective experiences and backgrounds including race, class, gender, sexual orientation, age, physical ability and economic means even as we struggle to understand those differences.
We promise to express our differences openly and respectfully, speaking directly with those involved, listening closely, offering real solutions in ways that are constructive and not judgmental, and accepting conflict as an inevitable aspect of healthy relationships.
We promise to provide an atmosphere for the minister to challenge us to think critically and creatively about all issues, thus carrying our congregations’ commitment to a free pulpit.
We promise to respect our children, to encourage their development as whole people, and to teach them the values of our religion, and other religions, as well.
We promise to welcome those who are new to our church and faith by learning about their journeys, by providing opportunities to learn more about us, and by explaining how they can become more involved in the church.
We promise to support each other through life’s ups and downs by creating an environment in which people feel safe to share, and by responding to the needs of the members of our congregation.
We promise to encourage one another in our efforts to promote social justice and responsible stewardship in the larger community and the world.
Beyond Us and Them
A Sermon Delivered on September 25, 2011
By
The Reverend Axel H. Gehrmann
Last week I had an amazing experience of community. A week ago Friday, to be more specific. It was exciting, captivating, heart-warming - and plain fun.
You see, last week I witnessed the football match at Urbana High School, at which the Urbana Tigers faced off against the Purple Raiders of Bloomington. It was quite a game. The first time in twenty years the Tigers beat the Raiders.
I confess, I was not an impartial observer in all of this. My daughter - after all - is a proud member of the Urbana High School marching band. And thus, in solidarity with her, and in solidarity with my wife Elaine, who is a hard-working member of the Urbana School Board, I have become a serious Urbana fan.
Now, I am not usually a big sports fan. I usually go out of my way to avoid rowdy crowds. And generally whenever two groups face off against one another, I try to consider the beliefs and perspective of both sides.
Not so last Friday. Last Friday my allegiance was crystal clear. We were orange and black. They were purple and white. The kids on our team were the “good guys.” The others were the “bad guys.” It was us against them.
As the game was going on, I was overcome by a profound sense of belonging, and an unmistakable sense of connection with the strangers standing in the bleachers around me: a colorful crowd of all ages and races - all of us crying out in one voice when our team fumbled the ball, and cheering as one when we scored a touchdown.
There is real power when we join ranks with our allies, and when our affiliation is clearly visible in the colors we carry. We may be a diverse crowd, but we are bound together as one, thanks to our unspoken agreement, and the clarity of our conviction that we are the “good guys,” and those people over there on the other side of the field, they are the “bad guys.”
Nothing seems to create a sense of community as effectively and reliably as a vivid experience of Us and Them.
Now, within the context of a high school football match, I think this is all fine and well. It’s all good fun.
Things become more problematic when these same dynamics are played out in other places. When the AstroTurf of the football field, is exchanged for the carpeted aisles of congress. And when the colors of the team uniforms are replaced by unmistakable party allegiances that are marked in blue and red.
In the real world - in the world of party politics, of international relations and of military interventions, in the world in which the interests of economy and ecology clash - in the real world the dynamics of Us and Them may be exciting and exhilarating, but the conflicts created in this way are not heart-warming fun and games. No, these conflicts are costly, and can easily lead us down a path of destruction and self-destruction.
The real world is plagued by deep divisions, and differences that seem all but irreconcilable. The game of Us and Them is a big part of the problem.
* * *
As Unitarian Universalists, we like to believe that we are not a part of this problem, but that we are part of the solution. If the “real world” is about being indifferent to people with whom we disagree, if the “real world” wants to divide us, putting gay people on that side and straight people on this side, if the “real world” is about praying to “our” God to save Us, and forget about Them - then we don’t want to be part of the “real world.” We want to help build a different world.
That’s what our congregational covenant is about. Our congregational covenant is an attempt to describe what that different world would look like. Some of the words we use are: respect, caring, inclusive, diverse, constructive, critical and creative, safe.
Our covenant is a promise we make to another, that we will try to practice these skills for living with one another, deepening our commitment to change the world beginning with ourselves.
Creating a covenant was an important step for us in 2005. But it is not enough. Covenants can be forgotten and covenants can be misunderstood.
* * *
I would like to believe that I am part of the solution and not part of the problems that plague the world. But truth be told - I often find myself playing the Us and Them game, too.
I confess, that I catch myself with great regularity, demonizing politicians with whom I disagree, or turning a cold shoulder to people whose beliefs differ from my own. I know I regularly gravitate toward like-minded groups of people, who share my views on foreign policy, or on human rights. And I do get a subtle charge when we collectively roll our eyes, or sigh as one, about that other half of the country that inexplicably disagrees with us.
The Us and Them attitude runs deep. In fact it is closely linked to the idea of covenant itself.
* * *
Our idea of covenant has a very long history. It reaches way down into our Christian and Jewish roots. The first covenant mentioned in the Book of Genesis is the covenant between God and Noah.
You probably know the story: Several generations had come and gone since Adam and Eve had left Eden, and all seemed to be well. Until Noah’s generation. When Noah was five hundred years old, God looked down upon the earth and saw that humanity had become wicked. Seeing such evil God was deeply troubled, and regretted ever having created humankind. So God said, “I will blot out man [and woman] I have created from the face of the ground,… and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.”
The only good thing God saw on earth was Noah, the one single person on earth who was righteous and blameless. So, since all flesh upon the earth was corrupted, God decided to destroy everything. Everything and everyone - except Noah. God warned Noah of the coming flood, told him to build a boat. And God said, “I will establish my covenant with you, your sons, your wife, and your sons’ wives with them.” Noah built an ark according to God’s instructions and loaded it with two of every kind of animal. Together they survived the flood - and life on earth continued.
Noah was a prophet chosen by God, and with him God made a covenant. A promise.
In the generations that followed there were other prophets and other covenants: with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses to name a few. Together they tell a powerful story of God’s chosen people. It is not a simple story. And it can be understood in different ways.
One of the more troubling lessons some have taken from the covenant tradition is that God chooses some people - but not others. The covenantal tradition can provide some very ancient and very weighty theological justification for us to believe the world really is divided between Us and Them. It provides justification for those of us who want to believe: We are the “good guys.” They are the “bad guys.” God wants us to live. God doesn’t care if they die.
There is plenty of evidence that many believers in the “real world” have taken this interpretation to heart.
But that is not the only way to understand God’s covenant.
You see, when the rain stopped, when the water receded, when the ground was dry, and the Ark was emptied, God said, “I will never again curse the ground… I will never again unleash such destruction.” God wants Abraham and all things living to be fruitful and multiply. And God amends his covenant with Noah, he broadens it. It is no longer an exclusive covenant with Noah and his kin. It is an inclusive covenant with all life.
In Genesis 9:9, God says, “Behold, I establish my covenant with you and your descendents after you, and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth… I will remember my covenant between me and you and every living creature of all flesh.” And God creates the rainbow as an eternal and universal sign of this covenant.
* * *
It is this understanding of covenant that we trace throughout our religious history - through Jewish and early Christian thought, through the Reformation and Protestantism, and the emerging belief that knowledge of God is not restricted to priests or prophets, but that every person has access to the divine. Our religious forebears came to see every believer is a priest. Every believer is a prophet. Every one of us.
Accordingly each of us is bound in covenant. Each of us is in covenant with God, with all living creatures - and also with each other.
This idea was brought to this country by the pilgrims and the Puritans: religious dissenters who rejected the authority of bishops and popes, and held instead that congregations should by governed by their members. This idea was carried on by congregational churches, many of which became Unitarian. This idea is the inspiration for our own congregational covenant.
* * *
There is perhaps no better way to create a sense of community, than to draw a circle around all of us, and to keep Us clearly divided from Them. But even though the feeling of community - the feeling of solidarity, the feeling of belonging - is real, the community is not. The community created by Us and Them is an illusion.
The lesson our covenantal tradition wants to teach us goes one step further. It teaches us that there is no Us and Them. There is only Us.
A covenant, at its best, reminds us of the connections that exist between those of us in this room, and with those of us beyond this room. It reminds us of our connection with the spirit of all life, the sacred universe, the divine.
A covenant reminds us that these connections exist - they are real, more real than anything in the so-called “real world” - and that we must foster these connections, we must deepen them.
This is the work of religious community - transforming the so-called “real world” into a world that is more real - beginning with our own lives, practicing respect and caring and creative, critical engagement.
Our covenant teaches us there is no Us and Them. It teaches us to exclude no one. It teaches us to welcome everyone.
If we do this, “then all that has divided us will merge, and then compassion will be wedded to power… then all will live in harmony with each other and the earth, and everywhere will be called Eden once again.”
So be it. Amen.